Research on the classification of CT images of COVID-19 by pre-training model based on self-attention mechanism

Nowadays, with the outbreak of COVID-19, the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 has gradually become the focus of social disease prevention, and most patients are also more concerned about the symptoms. COVID-19 has symptoms similar to the common cold, and it cannot be diagnosed based on the symptoms shown by the patient, so it is necessary to observe medical images of the lungs to finally determine whether they are COVID-19 positive. As the number of patients with symptoms similar to pneumonia increases, more and more medical images of the lungs need to be generated. At the same time, the number of physicians at this stage is far from meeting the needs of patients, resulting in patients unable to detect and understand their own conditions in time. In this regard, we have performed image augmentation, data cleaning, and designed a deep learning classification network based on the data set of COVID-19 lung medical images. accurate classification judgment. The network can achieve 95.76% classification accuracy for this task through a new fine-tuning method and hyperparameter tuning we designed, which has higher accuracy and less training time than the classic convolutional neural network model. © 2023 SPIE.

First Case Mild Symptoms COVID-19 in Rural Central Java Area: Case Report of an Indonesian Patient

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 virus infection is a pandemic that began to emerge in December 2019 in various countries with high death rates of 4-9% until now. In March 2020, Indonesia found its first case where the condition of the infection kept spreading to various regions in Indonesia. Different regional conditions in Indonesia make it difficult to manage this virus infection. The capability of the regional hospitals to detect this virus infection with their facilities and infrastructure is required. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old man came to the Ajibarang Regional Hospital with complaints of coughs and colds felt for 4 days and fever for 2 days. Physical examination found a good general condition, moderate pain, the temperature of 38.8degreeC, pharyngeal hyperemia, and minimal lung crackles sound. Laboratory tests showed normal leukocytes, platelet, and hemoglobin levels. Chest radiograph was suggestive of bronchitis. The patient was hospitalized for approximately 4 days until the fever resolved and was discharged. Five days after the patient was discharged from the hospital, the results of the viral load examination using real-time polymerase chain reaction confirmed positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION(S): This case showed unusual conditions of a mild clinical COVID-19 infection, laboratory results that did not support viral infections, as well as radiology examination of only bronchitis. The viral load test was found to be positive. Therefore, the diagnosis of the COVID-19 infection requires a comprehensive interpretation of complete history taking, clinical examination, laboratory, and radiology examinations for clinicians working with limited hospital facilities and infrastructures.Copyright © 2023 Edward Kurnia Setiawan Limijadi, Inge Cahya Ramadhani, Dian Tunjungsari Hartutiningtyas, Gara Samara Brajadenta.

Respiratory syncytial virus: desperately seeking solutions

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection remains a major public health problem, especially in younger children and the elderly. But several monoclonal antibodies, antivirals and vaccines, either recently launched or in development, offer new hope for RSV prevention and treatment.Copyright © 2023 Wiley Interface Ltd.

Clinical profile and outcomes of COVID-19 infection during the first wave in children with hematological illnesses and cancer: An observational study from a tertiary care center in North India

Background: Patients with cancer are at a higher risk of getting infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 owing to their immunocompromised state. Providing care to these patients amidst the first wave of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was extremely challenging. Objective(s): This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical profile and disease-related outcomes of pediatric patients with hematological illnesses and cancer. Material(s) and Method(s): This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India during the first wave of the pandemic from March 2020 to December 2020. Children aged up to 18 years, who were treated for a hematological illness or malignancy or underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and tested positive for COVID-19 regardless of symptoms were included in the study. Baseline demographic data related to the age, diagnosis, treatment status, and chemotherapy protocol used were collected. Outcomes including the cure rates, comorbidities, and sequelae were recorded. Result(s): A total of 650 tests for COVID-19 were performed for 181 children;22 patients were found to be COVID-19 positive. The most common diagnosis was acute leukemia (63.6%). None of the patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia. The majority of patients had asymptomatic infection and were managed at home. Among those with a symptomatic infection, the most common symptoms were fever and cough. A total of 3 (13.6%) patients needed oxygen therapy, one developed multisystem inflammatory syndrome of children leading to cardiogenic shock. Three patients required intensive care or respiratory support;all the patients had favorable clinical outcomes. The median time from the onset of COVID-19 to a negative result on the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test was 21.3 days. Cancer treatment was modified in 15 patients (68.2%). Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that children with hemato-oncological illnesses rarely experience severe COVID-19 disease. The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 primarily manifested as disruptions in the logistic planning and administration of essential treatment to these children rather than COVID-19 sequelae.Copyright © 2021 Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV- 2 in children of school-going age in district Swabi, Pakistan

Introduction: Earlier estimates of SARS-CoV- 2 do not accurately account for the extent of undiagnosed infections in children, who typically experience mild or asymptomatic disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV- 2 antibodies in children from District Swabi, one of the populous districts of Pakistan, and to identify symptoms most frequently associated with seropositivity. Methodology: We used ELISA to test for the presence of antibodies, IgM and IgG, in blood samples collected from 246 children of school-going age (5-16 years old) selected randomly from the district of Swabi, Pakistan. This study was approved by Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Ethical Board, and Advanced Studies Review Board. Data were collected on a purposefully built questionnaire. Result(s): Overall, 2.0% of our participants were seropositive for IgM, whereas 23.1% were seropositive for IgG. Older age, female gender, and contact history were significantly associated with higher seropositivity. Symptoms associated with seropositivity were: fever (98.0%), cough (90.0%), sore throat (79.0%), coryza (68.0%), myalgia (61.0%), loss of sense of smell and taste (49.0%), and vomiting or diarrhoea (8.0%). Although 77.6% of our IgG seropositive participants recalled experiencing flu-like symptoms, none of the participants in this study had visited the doctor or were tested for SARS-COV- 2. We found IgG titres to be significantly higher in symptomatic children. Conclusion(s): The number of undiagnosed infections in children may be substantially larger than the official accounts. Sparse data are available regarding coronavirus disease in children, particularly in low middle-income countries (LMIC). The most frequently symptoms were fever, cough, sore throat, coreza, myalgia, loss of sense of smell and taste and lastly vomiting and diarrhoea. Serological studies provide valuable insight into the immunological status of a population, and can prove vital when considering future strategies.

Targets and cross-reactivity of human T cell recognition of common cold coronaviruses.

The coronavirus (CoV) family includes several viruses infecting humans, highlighting the importance of exploring pan-CoV vaccine strategies to provide broad adaptive immune protection. We analyze T cell reactivity against representative Alpha (NL63) and Beta (OC43) common cold CoVs (CCCs) in pre-pandemic samples. S, N, M, and nsp3 antigens are immunodominant, as shown for severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS2), while nsp2 and nsp12 are Alpha or Beta specific. We further identify 78 OC43- and 87 NL63-specific epitopes, and, for a subset of those, we assess the T cell capability to cross-recognize sequences from representative viruses belonging to AlphaCoV, sarbecoCoV, and Beta-non-sarbecoCoV groups. We find T cell cross-reactivity within the Alpha and Beta groups, in 89% of the instances associated with sequence conservation >67%. However, despite conservation, limited cross-reactivity is observed for sarbecoCoV, indicating that previous CoV exposure is a contributing factor in determining cross-reactivity. Overall, these results provide critical insights in developing future pan-CoV vaccines.

Evidence for broad cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 NSP12-directed CD4+ T-cell response with pre-primed responses directed against common cold coronaviruses.

Introduction: The nonstructural protein 12 (NSP12) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a high sequence identity with common cold coronaviruses (CCC). Methods: Here, we comprehensively assessed the breadth and specificity of the NSP12-specific T-cell response after in vitro T-cell expansion with 185 overlapping 15-mer peptides covering the entire SARS-CoV-2 NSP12 at single-peptide resolution in a cohort of 27 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Samples of nine uninfected seronegative individuals, as well as five pre-pandemic controls, were also examined to assess potential cross-reactivity with CCCs. Results: Surprisingly, there was a comparable breadth of individual NSP12 peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell responses between COVID-19 patients (mean: 12.82 responses; range: 0-25) and seronegative controls including pre-pandemic samples (mean: 12.71 responses; range: 0-21). However, the NSP12-specific T-cell responses detected in acute COVID-19 patients were on average of a higher magnitude. The most frequently detected CD4+ T-cell peptide specificities in COVID-19 patients were aa236-250 (37%) and aa246-260 (44%), whereas the peptide specificities aa686-700 (50%) and aa741-755 (36%), were the most frequently detected in seronegative controls. In CCC-specific peptide-expanded T-cell cultures of seronegative individuals, the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 NSP12 peptide specificities also elicited responses in vitro. However, the NSP12 peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell response repertoire only partially overlapped in patients analyzed longitudinally before and after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Discussion: The results of the current study indicate the presence of pre-primed, cross-reactive CCC-specific T-cell responses targeting conserved regions of SARS-CoV-2, but they also underline the complexity of the analysis and the limited understanding of the role of the SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response and cross-reactivity with the CCCs.

Alternative structures of RNA control gene expression and offer therapeutic strategies

RNA viruses are diverse and abundant pathogens responsible for numerous human ailments, from common colds to AIDS, SARS, Ebola, and other dangerous diseases. RNA viruses possess relatively compact genomes and have therefore evolved multiple mechanisms to maximize their coding capacities, often using overlapping reading frames. In this way, one RNA sequence can encode multiple proteins via mechanisms including alternative splicing and ribosomal frameshifting. Many such processes in gene expression involve the RNA folding into three-dimensional structures that can recruit ribosomes without initiation factors, hijack host proteins, cause ribosomes to frameshift, and expose or occlude regulatory protein binding motifs to ultimately control each key process in the viral life cycle. I will discuss the RNA structure of HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and the importance of alternative conformations assumed by the same RNA sequence in controlling gene expression of viruses and bacteria.Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Evaluation with Roc Analysis, Logistics Regression Analysis and Other Statistical Tests Analysis of Retrospective Results of Biochemistry Laboratory Results, Analysised in Covid-19 Infected Serum or Plasma (Crp, Procalcitonin, Ferritin, D-Dimer, Fibrinogen, Ast, Alt, Ldh)

Objectives: A new type of coronavirus that emerged in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, caused the Covid-19 (SARS-COV2) pandemic. Common cold symptoms are seen, but in more severe cases, pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), coagulopathy, multi-organ failure are seen, and it causes death in the course of time. In this study, among the laboratory parameters followed in cases diagnosed with Covid-19 and followed in home isolation, service and intensive care unit;It is aimed to retrospectively evaluate CRP, procalcitonin, ferritin, D-Dimer, fibrinogen AST, ALT and LDH levels with ROC and other statistical analyzes in terms of predicting mortality in the treatment and follow-up of the disease. Materials-Methods: Between 01.04.2020 and 01.10.2020, the patients who applied to Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital with cold symptoms and were diagnosed with Covid-19 with RT-PCR positivity, were analyzed from Covid-19 infected serum and plasma. The results of the biomarkers were examined. Demographic data, vital signs and laboratory findings of the cases were compared. The results were statistically evaluated with the SPSS 22.0 package program. Result(s): 300 cases who received home isolation, service and supportive treatment in the intensive care unit were included in the study. Crp, Pct, D-dimer, ferritin, fibrinogen, LDH, AST and ALT values were found to be statistically significant. According to the results of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis performed to determine the predictive values of laboratory parameters that were significant as a result of univariate statistical analysis, Crp (0.890775), Pct (0.86795), D-dimer (0.856975), ferritin (0.836975), LDH (0.7829), fibrinogen (0.773925), AST (0.685925) and ALT (0.594025) were found. Conclusion(s): The high mutation ability of SARS-CoV-2 makes it difficult to control the pandemic. Therefore, early diagnosis of the disease has gained importance for the treatment of patients with high mortality risk. According to the ROC results we obtained in this study, it supports that CRP, Procalcitonin, Ferritin, D-dimer and LDH levels can be used as effective parameters in determining the prognosis and mortality risk in Covid-19 patients.

Circulation of respiratory viruses during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Gambia

Background: In many countries, non-pharmaceutical interventions to limit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission resulted in significant reductions in other respiratory viruses. However, similar data from Africa are limited. We explored the extent to which viruses such as influenza and rhinovirus co-circulated with SARS-CoV-2 in The Gambia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Between April 2020 and March 2022, respiratory viruses were detected using RT-PCR in nasopharyngeal swabs from 1397 participants with influenza-like illness. An assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 and a viral multiplex RT-PCR assay was used as previously described to detect influenza A and B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) A and B, parainfluenza viruses 1-4, human metapneumovirus (HMPV), adenovirus, seasonal coronaviruses (229E, OC43, NL63) and human rhinovirus. Result(s): Overall virus positivity was 44.2%, with prevalence higher in children <5 years (80%) compared to children aged 5-17 years (53.1%), adults aged 18-50 (39.5%) and >50 years (39.9%), p<0.0001. After SARS-CoV-2 (18.3%), rhinoviruses (10.5%) and influenza viruses (5.5%) were the most prevalent. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was lower in children <5 (4.3%) and 5-17 years (12.7%) than in adults aged 18-50 (19.3%) and >50 years (24.3%), p<0.0001. In contrast, rhinoviruses were most prevalent in children <5 years (28.7%), followed by children aged 5-17 (15.8%), adults aged 18-50 (8.3%) and >50 years (6.3%), p<0.0001. Four SARS-CoV-2 waves occurred, with 36.1%-52.4% SARS-CoV-2 positivity during peak months. Influenza infections were observed in both 2020 and 2021 during the rainy season as expected (peak positivity 16.4%-23.5%). Peaks of rhinovirus were asynchronous to the months when SARS-CoV-2 and influenza peaked. Conclusion(s): Our data show that many respiratory viruses continued to circulate during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Gambia, including human rhinoviruses, despite the presence of NPIs during the early stages of the pandemic, and influenza peaks during expected months.Copyright: © 2023 Jarju S et al.

PRIOR SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION PROTECTS AGAINST SYMPTOMATIC COMMON COLD CORONAVIRUSES

Background: Current COVID-19 vaccines provide substantial protection against severe COVID-19, but they do not completely eliminate subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infections. We examined incidence of and immune differences against related but different common cold coronaviruses (ccCoV) as a proxy for response against a future emerging CoV among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccination, or neither exposure. Method(s): We assessed incidence of ccCoV (229E, HKU1, NL63, OC43) and rhinovirus/enterovirus infections among those with documented prior SARSCoV- 2 infection (n=493), prior COVID-19 vaccine, but no SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=1,568), or no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination (n=2,874). We conducted a retrospective review of all individuals at Boston Medical Center that underwent a comprehensive respiratory panel polymerase chain reaction (CRP-PCR) test from November 30, 2020 to October 8, 2021 to estimate infection incidence. A subset within each group was assessed for coronavirus specific humoral and cellular immune responses, via pseudovirus neutralization and peptide stimulation T cell assays. Comparisons among the three groups were done using Chi-square and multi-variate Cox-proportional hazards models. Result(s): Incidence of symptomatic ccCoV was lower in those individuals with documented prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (1.0%) compared to those with COVID-19 vaccination (2.9%) or no prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure (1.8%, p = 0.01). Rhinovirus/enterovirus incidence was similar in all three groups (range 6.2 - 8.7%). Individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and those with previous COVID-19 vaccination had similar plasma neutralization against SARS-CoV-2, OC43, and 229E spike bearing pseudoviruses. SARS-CoV-2 (p = 0.01) and OC43 nucleocapsid (p = 0.02), but not spike specific peptides, yielded higher T cell responses in individuals with a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection as compared to those with COVID-19 vaccination or no prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Conclusion(s): Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, but not COVID-19 vaccination, protects against subsequent related but different ccCoV symptomatic infection. This protection against symptomatic ccCoVs may be mediated by cellular responses to non-spike proteins. Future pan-coronavirus vaccines could be improved by including both spike and non-spike antigens.

Pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ and antibody responses were low in Ugandan samples and significantly reduced in HIV-positive specimens.

Introduction: We investigated whether prior SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ and antibody responses in Ugandan COVID-19 pre-pandemic specimens aligned to this population's low disease severity. Methods: We used nucleoprotein (N), spike (S), NTD, RBD, envelope, membrane, SD1/2-directed IFN-γ ELISpots, and an S- and N-IgG antibody ELISA to screen for SARS-CoV-2-specific cross-reactivity. Results: HCoV-OC43-, HCoV-229E-, and SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ occurred in 23, 15, and 17 of 104 specimens, respectively. Cross-reactive IgG was more common against the nucleoprotein (7/110, 15.5%; p = 0.0016, Fishers' Exact) than the spike (3/110, 2.72%). Specimens lacking anti-HuCoV antibodies had higher rates of pre-epidemic SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ cross-reactivity (p-value = 0.00001, Fishers' exact test), suggesting that exposure to additional factors not examined here might play a role. SARS-CoV-2-specific cross-reactive antibodies were significantly less common in HIV-positive specimens (p=0.017; Fishers' Exact test). Correlations between SARS-CoV-2- and HuCoV-specific IFN-γ responses were consistently weak in both HIV negative and positive specimens. Discussion: These findings support the existence of pre-epidemic SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular and humoral cross-reactivity in this population. The data do not establish that these virus-specific IFN-γ and antibody responses are entirely specific to SARS-CoV-2. Inability of the antibodies to neutralise SARS-CoV-2 implies that prior exposure did not result in immunity. Correlations between SARS-CoV-2 and HuCoV-specific responses were consistently weak, suggesting that additional variables likely contributed to the pre-epidemic cross-reactivity patterns. The data suggests that surveillance efforts based on the nucleoprotein might overestimate the exposure to SARS-CoV-2 compared to inclusion of additional targets, like the spike protein. This study, while limited in scope, suggests that HIV-positive people are less likely than HIV-negative people to produce protective antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

Current Practices and Recommendations for Prioritizing Patients Mimicking Upper Respiratory Tract Symptoms in Period of Covid 19 Pandemic: A Strategic Perspective.

Upper respiratory tract symptoms can be caused by many diseases like Covid 19 disease, common cold, seasonal flu or allergy. This present a diagnostic dilemma in OPD to clinically identify which patient is suspected of Covid 19 disease and which is not. Which patient needs immediate Covid 19 testing, as not all patients presenting with these symptoms have Covid 19 disease. To develop a criteria which can help clinician in OPD while dealing with cases of upper respiratory tract symptoms and to highlight this grey area which needs further research. 107 patients with upper respiratory tract symptom over a period of 1 month, fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated and analysed. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I is High suspicion group having 43 cases, Group II Low Suspicion group having 64 cases. In group I there were 29 Covid 19 positive cases (67.44%). In group II there were 3 Covid 19 positive cases (4.6%). By dividing the patients of upper respiratory tract symptoms into three groups (I & II) a system can be made for proper, timely and efficient treatment of such cases.

COVID-19 and preventive strategy

In December 2019, an unprecedented outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) began to spread internationally, now impacting more than 293,750,692 patients with 5,454,131 deaths globally as of January 5, 2022. COVID-19 is highly pathogenic and contagious which has caused a large-scale epidemic impacting more deaths than the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in 2002-2003 or the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic in 2012-2013. Although COVID-19 symptoms are mild in most people, in those with pre-existing comorbidities there is an increased risk of progression to severe disease and death. In an attempt to mitigate this pandemic, urgent public health measures including quarantining exposed individuals and social distancing have been implemented in most states, while some states have even started the process of re-opening after considering both the economic and public health consequences of social distancing measures. While prevention is crucial, both novel agents and medications already in use with other indications are being investigated in clinical trials for patients with COVID-19. The collaboration between healthcare providers, health systems, patients, private sectors, and local and national governments is needed to protect both healthcare providers and patients to ultimately overcome this pandemic. The purpose of this review is to summarize the peer-reviewed and preprint literature on the epidemiology, transmission, clinical presentation, and available therapies as well as to propose a preventive strategy to overcome the present global pandemic.

Rhino- and Rs-Viruses in the Covid-19 Pandemic

Acute respiratory viral infections are distributed across the globe and are the most numerous human diseases caused by several hundreds of diverse viruses. Human rhinovirus is one of the most common respiratory pathogens worldwide, causing more than half of all acute respiratory viral infection cases. Seasonal human coronaviruses account for 10-15% of common cold cases;respiratory syncytial (RS) virus is the most common cause of respiratory hospitalization in infants;influenza viruses, adenoviruses, human parainfluenza virus, metapneumoviruses, and some other pathogens are also widespread. It is believed that viral common colds are mostly self-limited, causing mild infections that usually resolve within 8-10 days. However, the role of common seasonal respiratory viruses in total respiratory morbidity should not be underestimated. It turned out that during extraordinary conditions of pandemics, they behave differently. This was clearly demonstrated in the last 2009 influenza pandemic. Whereas some viruses lost relevance under the burden of a new aggressive pandemic strain, others, e.g., rhinovirus, continued to fight for existence and not only circulated along with the pandemic pathogen, but delayed its spread in some cases. For instance, the data from some European countries pointed out that the circulation of the H1N1pdm09 influenza A pandemic virus was interrupted by the annual rhinovirus outbreak. Ten years after the H1N1pdm09 influenza pandemic, a new virus outbreak emerged - the COVID-19 pandemic has begun. This pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has disrupted well-established pathogenetic and epidemiological relationships. The level of circulation of many respiratory pathogens has changed dramatically. For instance, global influenza activity has been at a much lower level than expected for the second year from now. In many regions of the world, the flu season has not been started yet. But what is interesting is that rhinoviruses together with RS-virus again showed their unique ability to compete with highly pathogenic and aggressive pathogens. Along with profoundly reduced circulation of many other seasonal respiratory viruses, rhinovirus, and RS-virus are the most frequently detected viruses. In this review, we have brought together the main biological characteristics of such genetically distinct viruses such as rhinovirus, influenza A virus, RS-virus, and SARS-CoV-2. We focused on their main similarities and discrepancies in the attempt to understand why they behave so differently in extreme pandemic conditions as well as what allows rhinoviruses and RS-viruses to coexist with SARS-CoV-2, which in turn almost fully replaced the influenza virus.

Neurological diseases caused by coronavirus infection of the respiratory airways

Infections of the central nervous system (CNS) infections are critical problems for public health. They are caused by several different organisms, including the respiratory coronaviruses (CoVs). CoVs usually infect the upper respiratory tract causing the common cold. However, in infants, and in elderly and immunocompromised persons, they can also affect the lower respiratory tract causing pneumonia and various syndromes of respiratory distress. CoVs also have neuroinvasive capabilities because they can spread from the respiratory tract to the CNS. Once infection begins in the CNS cells, it can cause various CNS problems such as status epilepticus, encephalitis, and long‐term neurological disease. This neuroinvasive properties of CoVs may damage the CNS as a result of misdirected host immune response, which could be associated with autoimmunity in susceptible individuals (virus‐induced neuro‐immunopathology) or associated with viral replication directly causing damage to the CNS cells (virus‐induced neuropathology). In December 2019, a new disease named COVID‐19 emerged which is caused by CoVs. The significant clinical symptoms of COVID‐19 are related to the respiratory system, but they can also affect the CNS, causing acute cerebrovascular and intracranial infections. We describe the possible invasion routes of coronavirus in this review article, and look for the most recent findings associated with the neurological complications in the recently published literature.

Coronaviruses

The coronaviruses belong to the family Coronaviridae in the order Nidovirales. CoVs are found globally and infect a variety of animals, causing illnesses that range from gastrointestinal tract infections, encephalitis and demyelination;and can be fatal. Humans coronaviruses (hCoVs) have traditionally been associated with self-limiting upper respiratory tract infections and gastrointestinal tract infections. In recent years, however, it has become increasingly evident that the hCoVs can cause more severe lower respiratory tract infections such as bronchitis, pneumonia and even acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and can lead to death. Seven CoVs are known to infect humans, with the four "common cold” CoVs circulating globally on a yearly basis. The remaining three are more pathogenic and have resulted in outbreaks with high mortality rates. This review focussed on the three pathogenic CoVs. © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 and other endemic corona viruses

In a study of two Hospitals in Saxony (Chemnitz and Leipzig), we analyzed the antibody development towards SARS-CoV-2 and against a variety of endemic coronaviruses. Here we analyzed 760 sera from a Saxonian cohort for antibody reactivity against: Common cold coronaviruses, HCoV-229E, HCoV-HKU 1, HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-OC43, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV. For the SARS CoV-2 immune response we tested the following antigens: Spike, S1, S2, RBD and nucleocapsid. These 11 antigen determinants were tested in a commercial multiplex Luminex based assay. We tested sera from 544 individuals (347 females and 197 males;498 SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive and 262 SARS-CoV-2 PCR negative) between May 2020 and March 2022. We observed up to 10% reactivity against the MERS virus in both the PCR positive and negative group. Against the common cold corona viruses 80%-90 % of the individuals in both groups show detectable antibodies. Regarding the antibody response against SARS-CoV a significant difference was observe. Only 19% of COVID-19 infected individuals show antibodies against the virus, while 81% of the PCR-positive individuals produced antibodies. The presence of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 is positively correlated with those against SARS-CoV (p = 0.001). No changes in endemic antibody responses were see in the two groups. The antibody status after first immunization event (infection/ vaccination) shows differences in nucleocapsiddirected antibody production, found in the natural infection group (about 60%). In the vaccination group, more individuals (up to 95%) show an immune response against Spike, S1 and RBD compare with natural infection. In summary, the examined cohort shows a general immunization up to 90% against most endemic corona viruses. Correlation analyses show cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Longitudinal antibody analyses are under way, as also correlations of humoral response with immunogenetic factors.

Rhinovirus-A True Respiratory Threat or a Common Inconvenience of Childhood?

A decade-long neglect of rhinovirus as an important agent of disease in humans was primarily due to the fact that they were seen as less virulent and capable of causing only mild respiratory infections such as common cold. However, with an advent of molecular diagnostic methods, an increasing number of reports placed them among the pathogens found in the lower respiratory tract and recognized them as important risk factors for asthma-related pathology in childhood. As the spread of rhinovirus was not severely affected by the implementation of social distancing and other measures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, its putative pathogenic role has become even more evident in recent years. By concentrating on children as the most vulnerable group, in this narrative review we first present classification and main traits of rhinovirus, followed by epidemiology and clinical presentation, risk factors for severe forms of the disease, long-term complications and the pathogenesis of asthma, as well as a snapshot of treatment trials and studies. Recent evidence suggests that the rhinovirus is a significant contributor to respiratory illness in both high-risk and low-risk populations of children.